Cyber act
A malicious act that uses a computer system to cause harm, as opposed to an unintentional cyber incident. The key term in the LMA 5400 and 5401 property clauses.
Very narrow. LMA 5400 writes back one thing only: physical damage caused by the fire or explosion perils arising out of a non-malicious cyber incident. It writes back neither the resulting business interruption nor anything connected to a malicious cyber act.
In November 2019, the Lloyd's Market Association issued the LMA 5400 and 5401 property clauses. They answered Lloyd's Market Bulletin Y5258 of July 2019, which required every policy to state whether it covers or excludes cyber risk, putting an end to silent cyber. In these clauses, a cyber act is a malicious act that uses a computer system to cause harm; a cyber incident is an error or failure with no intent to harm. The LMA 5400 write-back turns entirely on that difference. LMA 5400 excludes any loss arising from a cyber act, but writes back physical damage from fire or explosion caused by a non-malicious cyber incident. LMA 5401 excludes both, with no exceptions. The line is thin: a misconfiguration that starts a fire is a cyber incident, an attack that starts the same fire is a cyber act. On a claim, the real fight is often over proving intent. State cyber operation, the term used in the cyber war clauses (LMA 5564 to 5567), is a separate concept.
Textbook case: a hacker takes over a server room's climate control system and overheats the room until it catches fire. That is a cyber act, since malicious intent is established, and LMA 5400 would not cover the fire. Had the overheating come from an unintentional software fault, it would be a cyber incident, and the physical fire damage would fall within the LMA 5400 write-back.
The wording of each of these clauses, with its variants, can be read and compared in the LMA comparator.
cyber act, malicious cyber act, cyber operation, LMA 5400, lma5400, LMA 5401, lma5401
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.