Gap between an insurer's stated climate commitments and the real content of its underwriting and investment portfolios, now recognized as a distinct legal and reputational risk.
Greenwashing in insurance refers to the gap between an insurer's publicly stated climate commitments, carbon neutrality, coal exit, alignment with a 1.5-degree scenario, and the real content of its underwriting and investment portfolios, when that gap stems from misleading communication rather than a mere delay in execution. This risk has taken clearer legal shape as non-governmental organizations and specialized law firms have begun filing complaints with advertising regulators or financial supervisory authorities against insurers judged to be falling short of their own commitments, one notable complaint having targeted the Lloyd's of London market before the UK advertising regulator over campaigns deemed misleading about its climate footprint. The risk touches both reputation, a publicized greenwashing accusation can cancel out the positive reputational effect the original commitment sought, and law, with some jurisdictions treating a misleading environmental claim as a sanctionable unfair commercial practice. For an insurer, the best documented protection remains the granularity and verifiability of its commitments: a quantified, dated and audited target exposes it far less to this risk than a general climate-alignment formula whose achievement cannot be verified by a third party.
The Lloyd's of London market was the subject of a complaint filed by the organization ClientEarth with the UK advertising regulator, challenging communications deemed misleading about its climate commitments given its continued underwriting of fossil-fuel-related risks.
insurance greenwashing, allégation climatique trompeuse, écoblanchiment assurance