Financial materiality
The character of a factor that genuinely affects financial performance or risk, as opposed to a mere moral preference.
Textbook case: a company's exposure to fossil fuels is financially material, because it signals transition risk, litigation and asset impairments that the insurer can price. A criterion is material when it has a proven effect on the company's loss experience, performance or risk, and on that basis it enters the underwriting analysis. Applied to ESG, the notion separates the criteria that predict loss, failing governance, climate exposure, pollution, from those that express an ethical preference with no demonstrated link to risk. The underwriter gains by being apolitical: it observes what costs money and passes no judgment on what is desirable. That is what lets the approach survive the backlash against values-based ESG. The limit is evidence, since a statistical link to loss is built on histories that many criteria do not yet have. Double materiality, adopted by the CSRD directive, adds the company's impact on the environment to the environment's impact on the company.
A company's exposure to fossil fuels is financially material, because it signals risks of transition, litigation and asset depreciation that the insurer can legitimately price.
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.