Title risk
Risk that an asset may be claimed by a third party on the ground that its holder never validly acquired ownership, central to artworks.
Title risk is the possibility that a third party claims an asset on the ground that its current holder never validly acquired ownership. The asset may have been stolen, looted or transferred without right at some point in its chain of provenance. The risk is particularly acute for artworks, whose history can hold gray areas going back decades. Nazi-era looting comes first among them. The 1998 Washington Principles set a framework for it, and it still feeds high-profile restitution litigation. Unlike theft or fire, a title loss does not destroy the object. It wipes out the holder's right, and the holder may be forced to return a work acquired in good faith. Specific title insurance policies, long a niche product, cover this risk by guaranteeing the work's value if a claim succeeds. They matter more as provenance due-diligence requirements tighten. Authenticity stays outside their scope: a title policy guarantees the right to the work, not its attribution.
The Cassirer case, concerning Pissarro's painting Rue Saint-Honoré, après-midi, effet de pluie, illustrates title risk: the claim of a looted family's heirs pursued the work decades after the events, all the way to the US Supreme Court, which ruled on the applicable law on April 21, 2022.
- Center for Art Law, "Spotlight: ARIS Title Insurance Corporation" (the title policy excludes authenticity)
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.