Washington Principles
1998 international framework on the restitution of Nazi-confiscated artworks, the foundation of modern provenance litigation.
On December 3, 1998, forty-four states meeting at the Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets adopted eleven non-binding principles for identifying and restituting artworks confiscated by the Nazi regime. States and institutions are asked to search their collections for looted works, publish provenances and help rightful claimants with their research. The goal is a just and fair solution, which can range from outright restitution to compensation or a custody agreement. The principles bind no one, and they still changed the art market. Provenance research has become a due-diligence standard for museums, auction houses and insurers, and looting-based claims still feed high-profile litigation decades after the events. For insurance, they turned title into an identified and insurable risk: a work with a provenance gap over the 1933-1945 period carries a claim risk that title policies seek to cover and that underwriting must assess.
A museum discovers that a painting in its collection has a provenance gap between 1938 and 1946. Applying the Washington Principles, it publishes the information, undertakes research into rightful claimants and negotiates a just and fair solution with the identified heirs. Dated benchmark: the eleven principles were adopted on December 3, 1998, at the Washington Conference on Holocaust-Era Assets, by forty-four states, with no binding force.
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.