Skip to content
←Back to glossaryActuarial science

No-claims discount

Experience rating mechanism adjusting premium according to the policyholder's own claims history, correcting both the residual adverse selection and the moral hazard that a priori rating leaves behind.

Definition

In 1976, a standard clause annexed to article A. 121-1 of the French Insurance Code imposed the same reduction and increase coefficient on every French motor insurer. It answers a limit of a priori rating, which observes characteristics but not carefulness: two drivers of the same age, vehicle and territory do not carry the same risk, and the no-claims discount captures that residual gap by charging policyholders according to what they have done. The mechanism works on two registers. It corrects heterogeneity that a priori criteria never reach, which makes it a direct application of credibility theory, with the discount class playing the role of the Z factor. It also creates an incentive, since a reported claim costs the deductible plus several years of surcharge; moral hazard recedes and, as a less desired effect, small claims stop being reported. Designing a scale means setting how severe the surcharge is, how fast the scale comes back down after a clean year and whether discount protection exists. France chose a uniform rule, while other European markets let each insurer define its own scale, which makes cross-border premium comparison misleading.

Its 6 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
No-claims discount: Actuarial science glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

The French reduction and increase coefficient, imposed on all motor insurers in 1976 and set by the standard clause annexed to article A. 121-1 of the Insurance Code, applies a 25% surcharge per at-fault claim and a 5% reduction per claim-free year, rounded down to two decimals, with a floor at 0.50 reached after thirteen years and a ceiling at 3.50. A driver who has been at 0.50 for less than three years and reports an at-fault claim moves to 0.62 and needs four clean years to come back down, a cumulative extra cost that can exceed the amount of a small property claim.

Read next
Related terms
Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.