Skip to content
←Back to glossaryActuarial science

Cape Cod method

A variant of Bornhuetter-Ferguson that does not take the a priori loss ratio from expert judgment but computes it from the triangle itself, weighted by already developed exposure.

Definition

Bornhuetter and Ferguson published a method in 1972, in the Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, that is worth exactly what its a priori loss ratio is worth. That a priori often comes from pricing, that is, from the very source reserving is supposed to check. The Cape Cod method, set out by Stanard in the same Proceedings in 1985, removes the dependency by estimating a single loss ratio from the triangle itself. You divide the sum of reported cumulative amounts across all accident years by the sum of premiums weighted by each year's percent developed. A year developed to 15% contributes 15% of its premium to the denominator, which stops recent immature years from dragging the loss ratio down. The Bornhuetter-Ferguson mechanics are then applied with that loss ratio. The method assumes every accident year shares the same expected loss ratio, which stops being true once the book spans an underwriting cycle. In a market that has moved from soft to hard, Cape Cod blends years priced at 95% and at 62% and returns an average that describes neither. Gluck's generalized variant (Proceedings, 1997), which weights each year by a decay factor according to its distance from the year being estimated, softens the flaw.

Its 5 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Cape Cod method: Actuarial science glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Professional liability book as of December 31, 2025, six accident years. Total reported cumulatives 52.4M EUR, total premium 96M EUR, weighted developed exposure 71.8M EUR. Cape Cod loss ratio = 52.4 / 71.8 = 73%, against a pricing a priori of 66% that had been carried for three closings. The seven-point gap, applied to the undeveloped share, adds 1.7M EUR of reserve and triggered a rate review for the line.

Read next
Sources
  • Spencer M. Gluck, "Balancing Development and Trend in Loss Reserve Analysis", Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, vol. LXXXIV, 1997, pp. 482-532
Related terms
Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.