Skip to content
←Back to glossaryActuarial science

Negative binomial distribution

Count distribution whose variance exceeds its mean, obtained by mixing a Poisson law with a gamma law, and which describes claim frequencies far better than pure Poisson.

Definition

Greenwood and Yule showed in 1920, in the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, that individual accident counts fit the Poisson law poorly and fit a mixture well, the one that yields the negative binomial distribution. The Poisson law forces variance to equal mean. Real claim frequencies almost never respect that constraint: their variance is larger, which is overdispersion. Several causes stack. The book is heterogeneous, each policyholder carrying its own risk intensity. Claims arrive in clusters, one storm generating a hundred notifications on the same day. And the intensity varies year to year with weather or the economy. Mixing a Poisson law with a gamma law over its intensity parameter yields exactly a negative binomial, and the gamma parameter measures heterogeneity. Ignoring overdispersion understates aggregate loss in the tail; in a generalized linear model it also makes coefficient standard errors too small, so rating variables get declared significant when they are not. The fix is an explicit negative binomial or an estimated dispersion parameter.

Its 5 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Negative binomial distribution: Actuarial science glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Motor book of 180,000 policies, 2025 year. Observed mean frequency 5.1%, observed variance of claim count per policy 0.068 against 0.051 expected under Poisson, a dispersion ratio of 1.33. Under negative binomial the confidence interval on the driver age coefficient widens by 15%, and two territory levels that looked significant under Poisson stop being so.

Read next
Related terms
Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.