Mutual and reciprocal insurer
Insurance company forms owned by their policyholders rather than by shareholders, whose capital structure changes both governance and financial room for maneuver.
In 1922 twenty-five US Army officers decided to insure each other's cars, which insurers were reluctant to cover; their reciprocal became USAA. A mutual has no shareholders: its members are both policyholders and owners, and profit comes back to them as a rebate, a lower contribution or own funds, never as a dividend. The reciprocal, common in the United States, goes further. Subscribers insure one another and hand management to a paid attorney-in-fact, which carries no risk and may itself be listed, as Erie Indemnity is for the Erie Insurance Exchange. Against the joint-stock company, governance answers to policyholders, which sets the decision horizon on the duration of liabilities. Capital, on the other hand, cannot be raised on equity markets. Growth depends on retained earnings and subordinated debt, and in France the ESS law of 31 July 2014 created mutual certificates to open the door slightly. Lastly no takeover can punish mediocre management, which shifts onto the supervisor and internal bodies a discipline the market exerts elsewhere.
Mutual forms carry a significant share of European life and non-life markets, and access to capital is their most visible constraint: several European mutual groups have issued subordinated debt eligible as prudential own funds precisely because share issuance is closed to them by their legal form.
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.