Skip to content
←Back to glossaryCyber

Olympic Destroyer (Pyeongchang Games, 2018)

Wiper launched during the opening ceremony of the Pyeongchang Winter Games on February 9, 2018, laced with fake North Korean and Chinese clues, attributed to the GRU by US prosecutors in October 2020.

Definition

On February 9, 2018, during the opening ceremony of the Pyeongchang Winter Games, the organizing committee's network went down. Stadium wifi, screens, ticketing and the official website stopped working; spectators could not print their tickets. Teams restored most of it overnight. The code, named Olympic Destroyer, wiped and spread with stolen credentials. It also carried carefully planted clues: fragments recalling Lazarus, others Chinese groups. In March 2018, Kaspersky showed that the file header pointing to North Korea had been forged. On October 19, 2020, the US Justice Department charged six GRU officers from unit 74455, Sandworm's unit, for Olympic Destroyer, NotPetya and the attacks on the Ukrainian power grid. The motive alleged was revenge for Russia's ban from the Games over doping. The case taught the market two things. A false flag can point at another state, not only at a criminal group. And technical attribution can take two and a half years to become a court filing, longer than a policy term.

Its 7 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Olympic Destroyer (Pyeongchang Games, 2018): Cyber glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Constructed example: the organizer of a major sporting event buys a one-year cyber policy with LMA 5565. A wiper hits ticketing on opening day. Early clues point to state A, then to state B. No government attributes the attack during the policy period: the insurer pays, unable to establish the exclusion on objectively reasonable inference.

Read next
Put it to work
Related terms
Also known as

Olympic Destroyer, Pyeongchang Olympics attack, Pyeongchang 2018 attack

Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.