Currency clause in reinsurance
A clause fixing the currency of the treaty's premiums, losses and limits, and the conversion rate applied when the cedant's transactions are in other currencies; it moves the exchange risk between cedant and reinsurer.
A Singapore insurer buys an excess of loss treaty denominated in US dollars for a portfolio whose claims are settled in Singapore dollars, ringgit and rupees. When a loss occurs, what amount is deemed lost: that of the loss date, the settlement date, the account date? The currency clause answers. It first fixes the treaty's currency, that of the retention, the limit and the premium, generally the dollar, euro or pound. It then specifies how to convert claims and premiums denominated in another currency: at the rate of the settlement date, the rate of the loss notice date, or an average rate for the period. The choice is not neutral. A retention of ten million dollars is reached faster if the cedant's local currency depreciates between the loss and the settlement, which can help or hurt depending on direction. For long-tail claims paid years later, the difference is large. Exchange stabilization clauses, which guarantee a rate or a capped gap, exist but are rare. The reinsurer generally covers its exchange risk with assets in the treaty currency. A disagreement over the clause is a source of dispute, and it is read together with the full wording.
Textbook case. Treaty of USD 20M excess of USD 10M, Singapore insurer. A USD 14M loss, settled in SGD at 1.30 SGD per USD: SGD 18.2M. If the SGD depreciates to 1.40 between notice and settlement, a clause using the settlement date rate gives SGD 18.2M / 1.40 = USD 13M, so the excess over the USD 10M retention is only USD 3M. At the notice date rate, USD 14M, the excess borne by the reinsurer is USD 4M. The clause decides one million.
currency clause, treaty currency, reinsurance currency clause, exchange rate clause, currency fluctuation clause reinsurance
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.