Skip to content
←Back to glossaryReinsurance

CRESTA zones

Common geographic grid that insurers and reinsurers use to report and monitor their natural catastrophe accumulations.

Definition

CRESTA zones (Catastrophe Risk Evaluating and Standardizing Target Accumulations) are the common grid the market uses to report its natural catastrophe accumulations. The organization that maintains them brings together the main insurers and reinsurers; it divides each country into zones that are roughly uniform in their exposure to natural perils, so that everyone counts accumulations the same way. Resolution depends on how much a country matters for nat cat: in France, the low-resolution zones follow the départements and the high-resolution zones the postcodes. When placing its cat treaty, the cedant submits its insured values zone by zone, in millions of local currency, and the reinsurer works out its maximum exposure to a windstorm, flood or earthquake. A CRESTA zone gives no loss figure. It tells you where the values sit; the probable maximum loss (PML) comes later, from a cat model that takes those accumulations as input, as the major vendors' models (Verisk, Moody's RMS) do. A cat underwriter therefore looks at two numbers per zone, the reported sum insured and the modeled loss, and the gap between them is what gets argued at renewal. Without the grid, every insurer would have its own map, and no one could add up the market's exposures or see where they pile up.

Its 5 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
CRESTA zones: Reinsurance glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Textbook case: at a quarterly review, an international reinsurer finds it has built up 4.5 billion euros of gross exposure in CRESTA zones 06, 13, 30 and 83 (Alpes-Maritimes, Bouches-du-Rhône, Gard, Var), covering the French Riviera and the Rhône delta, where flood is the main peril. Its internal zone limit is 3.5 billion (example assumption), so it is 1 billion over. It cuts back its renewals in those zones and sheds 400 million, which brings the accumulation down to 4.1 billion. For the remaining 600 million it buys an ILW on the ILS market, capping its net exposure at 4.1 - 0.6 = 3.5 billion, right at its limit, subject to basis risk, since the ILW is triggered by the total market loss.

Read next
Put it to work
Related terms
Related articles
Go further at the Academy
Also known as

CRESTA, CRESTA zones, accumulation zones, cresta zone, what are cresta zones, CRESTA zoning, CRESTA accumulation zones

Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.