Major shareholder exclusion
A D&O (directors and officers) exclusion barring claims by a shareholder holding more than a set stake, often 10 or 15%, to guard against collusion with the directors.
The major shareholder exclusion is a D&O (directors and officers) exclusion that bars claims by a shareholder whose stake exceeds a threshold set in the policy. The standard wording excludes any claim brought by or on behalf of a shareholder holding, directly or indirectly, more than 15% of the policyholder's capital or voting rights. The threshold varies from policy to policy: 10% in some wordings, more in others. The logic is borrowed from the insured versus insured exclusion. A major shareholder often sits on the board through its representatives, has sway over the directors it is suing and may have an interest in turning an investment loss into a D&O claim. The insurer does not want to fund a dispute between shareholders, and it fears collusion between plaintiff and defendant. Two drafting points decide how far the clause really reaches. First, the threshold calculation: a direct holding or one through controlled companies, taken alone or in concert with other holders, measured on the date of the claim or of the wrongful act. Then the carve-backs. Many policies restore cover when the shareholder acts without the solicitation, assistance or active participation of an insured. Some also restore it when the claim takes the form of a derivative action, the action sociale ut singuli under French law, whose proceeds go to the company. In private equity, the exclusion hits the most likely case: the fund holding 60% of the target is the one that will sue the executive it appointed after a failed acquisition. Policies written for funds handle the issue separately, with their own cover for directors placed on portfolio company boards.
Textbook case: an industrial group holds 22% of a listed company and two seats on its board. After a capital increase it sees as dilutive, it sues the chairman and the CEO (chief executive officer). In this example, the D&O (directors and officers) policy excludes claims by shareholders above 15%, and the insurer declines cover. Had the group sued through the action ut singuli, in the company's name, a carve-back for derivative actions could have restored cover, depending on the wording.
major shareholder exclusion, large shareholder exclusion, controlling shareholder exclusion, significant shareholder exclusion
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.