Skip to content
←Back to glossaryInsurance

Major shareholder exclusion

A D&O (directors and officers) exclusion barring claims by a shareholder holding more than a set stake, often 10 or 15%, to guard against collusion with the directors.

Definition

The major shareholder exclusion is a D&O (directors and officers) exclusion that bars claims by a shareholder whose stake exceeds a threshold set in the policy. The standard wording excludes any claim brought by or on behalf of a shareholder holding, directly or indirectly, more than 15% of the policyholder's capital or voting rights. The threshold varies from policy to policy: 10% in some wordings, more in others. The logic is borrowed from the insured versus insured exclusion. A major shareholder often sits on the board through its representatives, has sway over the directors it is suing and may have an interest in turning an investment loss into a D&O claim. The insurer does not want to fund a dispute between shareholders, and it fears collusion between plaintiff and defendant. Two drafting points decide how far the clause really reaches. First, the threshold calculation: a direct holding or one through controlled companies, taken alone or in concert with other holders, measured on the date of the claim or of the wrongful act. Then the carve-backs. Many policies restore cover when the shareholder acts without the solicitation, assistance or active participation of an insured. Some also restore it when the claim takes the form of a derivative action, the action sociale ut singuli under French law, whose proceeds go to the company. In private equity, the exclusion hits the most likely case: the fund holding 60% of the target is the one that will sue the executive it appointed after a failed acquisition. Policies written for funds handle the issue separately, with their own cover for directors placed on portfolio company boards.

Its 5 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Major shareholder exclusion: Insurance glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Textbook case: an industrial group holds 22% of a listed company and two seats on its board. After a capital increase it sees as dilutive, it sues the chairman and the CEO (chief executive officer). In this example, the D&O (directors and officers) policy excludes claims by shareholders above 15%, and the insurer declines cover. Had the group sued through the action ut singuli, in the company's name, a carve-back for derivative actions could have restored cover, depending on the wording.

Read next
Related terms
Also known as

major shareholder exclusion, large shareholder exclusion, controlling shareholder exclusion, significant shareholder exclusion

Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.