Development-risk defense
A defense that clears the manufacturer of liability if, when the product was placed on the market, the state of knowledge did not allow the defect to be detected.
Directive 85/374/EEC of July 25, 1985, Article 7(e), carried into Article 1245-10 of the French Civil Code: the producer escapes liability if it proves that the state of scientific and technical knowledge, when the product was placed on the market, did not allow the defect to be detected. The whole defense assumes an object frozen at the factory gate, and a single moment at which the state of the art is measured. That worked for a boiler or a mechanical car. It doesn't work for a connected product. The maker of an embedded system keeps control of the product after the sale, through updates, telemetry and remote access. The reference moment the defense relied on dissolves into a continuous flow of changes. The revised product liability directive draws the consequence. The defense survives, but it can no longer be raised where the defect comes from a related service, an update, or a failure to update that stayed within the manufacturer's control. As long as the product keeps changing, its liability never closes.
Directive (EU) 2024/2853 on liability for defective products entered into force on December 9, 2024. Member states must transpose it by December 9, 2026, and it replaces the forty-year-old Directive 85/374/EEC. It expressly brings software within the notion of a product. And it strips the manufacturer of the development-risk defense where the defect stems from something that stayed under its control after the product was placed on the market.
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.