Effective ability to replace one provider with another, measured in migration time rather than market share, and the only criterion genuinely expressing the systemic character of a dependency.
Concentration is usually judged by the number of participants in a market, competition-law reasoning that applies poorly to accumulation risk. Three hosting providers make an acceptable oligopoly if one can move between them within a quarter, and an intolerable risk structure if migration takes three years. It is therefore not market share that produces systemic character, it is switching cost. The practical consequence for underwriting is direct: asking an insured who hosts its systems has little informational value, asking how long it would take to change supplies a numerical answer that measures the exposure. The reasoning extends beyond the cloud, to any technical dependency whose exit requires reconstruction rather than a mere change of contract.
A portfolio can show exemplary diversification by country, by class and by site, while resting entirely on three nodes nobody measures.
substitutability, remplaçabilité, coût de changement, switching cost