Skip to content
←Back to glossarySpecial risks

Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum theft (1990)

Thirteen works stolen in Boston on the night of March 18, 1990, about 500 million dollars, from a museum with no theft cover: no indemnity, and a reward as the only path to recovery.

Definition

On the night of March 18, 1990, two men in police uniforms get themselves let in through the staff door of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston, tie up the two guards in the basement and leave with thirteen works, including Vermeer's "The Concert" and "The Storm on the Sea of Galilee," Rembrandt's only known seascape. The value most often cited is around 500 million dollars. The museum had no theft insurance. No indemnity, then, and no subrogated insurer to fund its own search or negotiate a buy-back. A fine art underwriter reads the file backward. A collection of that value at a single site, guarded at night by two people, would first have raised an accumulation question, ahead of any question of rate, and security (the door-opening procedure, patrols, an alarm wired to a monitoring center) would have become a condition of cover. The museum bore the loss alone. Its only possible "indemnity" is restitution, and it pays for it up front as a reward: 5 million dollars for years, raised to 10 million in 2017. The founder's will forbids any change to the hanging, and the empty frames are still on the walls. The case also shows that a work this famous cannot be sold in the open: its market value says nothing about what it is worth to whoever holds it. More than thirty-five years later, none of the thirteen pieces has been recovered. Not to be confused with art theft in general, the risk the entry of that name describes for all collections, nor with a buy-back clause after recovery, which assumes an indemnity has been paid.

Its 6 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum theft (1990): Special risks glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Dated case: the museum offers 10 million dollars for the return of the thirteen works in good condition. Measured against the commonly cited value of 500 million, the reward comes to 2% of the loss. An insurer that had covered the collection at that agreed value would have paid 500 million, taken title to the works, and could have offered the same reward: 10 million to recover a 500 million asset, a 2% recovery cost it would then have sought to sell back to the insured through the buy-back clause.

Read next
Related terms
Also known as

Gardner heist, Gardner Museum robbery, theft of Vermeer's The Concert, Boston museum heist of 1990

Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.