Underwriting copilot
An assistant built on a language model that prepares the underwriter's work, file summary, comparison with appetite, drafting a first analysis, while leaving the decision and its accountability to the human.
An underwriting copilot is a tool that supports the underwriter in analyzing a risk without deciding in its place. It reads the submission and attachments, extracts the key information, checks it against the underwriting guide and appetite, spots inconsistencies and missing information, recalls comparable risks already written, computes useful indicators and drafts a first analysis note that the underwriter reviews, corrects and completes. It can also prepare questions for the broker or subjectivities to require. The aim is to free the underwriter from reading and formatting tasks so as to spend time on judgment, where value is created. The risks are those of any assistant: reading errors, invented information, and above all automation bias, the human tendency to approve without checking what a machine proposes, which turns assistance into de facto decision. Governance therefore requires that the decision remain formally human and documented, that the sources of each copilot statement be visible, and that its errors be measured. The copilot does not replace underwriting authority: it equips it.
Textbook case: a cyber underwriter receives an 80-page submission. Within minutes the copilot extracts the declared controls, flags that the application claims multi-factor authentication while an attached report says it is still being deployed, and proposes a corresponding subjectivity. The underwriter checks the extract, keeps the subjectivity and sets the price personally.
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.