Skip to content
←Back to glossaryReinsurance

Canterbury earthquakes (2010-2011)

A sequence of earthquakes in New Zealand, from September 2010 to late 2011, that made Christchurch a textbook case of event counting, reinstatements and cumulative damage to the same building.

Definition

On September 4, 2010, at 4:35 a.m., a magnitude 7.1 earthquake strikes Darfield, about forty kilometers from Christchurch: heavy damage, no deaths. On February 22, 2011, a magnitude 6.3 aftershock, shallow and almost beneath the city center, kills 185 people and destroys the business district. Further shocks follow, including those of June 13 and December 23, 2011. Insured losses for the whole sequence amount to more than 30 billion New Zealand dollars, one of the highest ever measured against a country's domestic output. The Earthquake Commission (EQC), a public insurer, paid residential losses first, up to 100,000 New Zealand dollars per dwelling at the time, and its cover reinstated with each event. Private insurers took the rest and all commercial business. For reinsurance, the sequence tested everything. The hours clause (generally 72 hours for earthquake) made each large aftershock a separate event, with a new retention and a reinstatement used up. Depending on the renewal date, the sequence ran across two treaty years. And the damage to a building hit three times had to be split between events, often with no survey in between: disputes lasted years, and the EQC had to reopen thousands of files. After 2011, New Zealand capacity became much more expensive, and home insurers replaced uncapped full replacement cover with declared sums insured. Not to be confused with a single large magnitude event such as Tohoku: in Christchurch, repetition made the loss.

Its 6 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Canterbury earthquakes (2010-2011): Reinsurance glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Textbook case: a New Zealand cedant has a catastrophe treaty of 200 million in excess of 50 million, with one reinstatement, 400 million in all for the year. September 2010: net loss of 150 million, the treaty pays 100. February 2011: 400 million, the treaty pays its limit, 200. June 2011: 120 million, 100 million of capacity remains out of the 400, the treaty pays 70. Recovered: 370 million. The cedant keeps 300 million, its three retentions (150 million) plus the 150 million of February above the limit, and pays a reinstatement premium on the 200 million reinstated.

Read next
Related terms
Also known as

Christchurch earthquake, Canterbury earthquake sequence, Darfield earthquake, Christchurch earthquakes 2011

Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.