Medium-term hurricane rates
Hurricane frequencies set for the next five years rather than the average observed since 1900, offered by catastrophe models since the 2004 and 2005 seasons.
Medium-term hurricane rates are hurricane frequencies set for the next five years rather than the average observed since the early twentieth century. They reweight a catastrophe model's stochastic catalog without changing the events themselves. The long-term catalog, by contrast, rests on the historical Atlantic hurricane database (HURDAT) going back to 1900. It all goes back to 2005: Katrina, Rita and Wilma hit the United States within weeks of each other, a year after Florida's four hurricanes. In 2006 RMS made a medium-term view, drawn from an expert elicitation, the default setting of its North Atlantic hurricane model. AIR answered with a catalog conditioned on warm sea surface temperatures. The physics is simple enough. The Atlantic runs through warm and cold phases lasting decades (the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, AMO), and a warm phase produces more major hurricanes. So the modeler raises the annual landfall rate by category and by region, then reruns the exceedance curves: average loss goes up, and the return period of any given loss gets shorter. Many reinsurers took this view as their reference. It never won everyone over. The Florida commission that certifies models used in residential ratemaking sticks to long-term historical frequencies. And no major hurricane made US landfall between Wilma (2005) and Harvey (2017), which fed the suspicion that the expert panel had read too much into two extreme seasons. When two PMLs (probable maximum loss) disagree, the first question is which catalog each one runs on: the rate gap often outweighs the model gap.
Textbook case, made-up figures: a Florida residential book shows a 40 million dollar average annual loss on the long-term catalog. Category 3 to 5 hurricanes drive 70% of it. The medium-term view lifts their frequency by 25% and leaves the rest alone: 40 × (0.30 + 0.70 × 1.25) = 47 million. Yesterday's 1-in-100 loss becomes roughly a 1-in-80 loss, and the technical cost of an upper layer in the reinsurance program follows.
medium-term rates, near-term hurricane rates, medium-term hurricane frequency, warm SST conditioned catalog
Follow the research
One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.
No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.