Skip to content
←Back to glossaryActuarial science

Wang transform

Pricing method that distorts a risk's survival function through the normal distribution, S*(x) = Φ(Φ⁻¹(S(x)) + λ), before taking its expectation, which loads the least likely layers more heavily.

Definition

The Wang transform distorts a risk's survival function before taking its expectation. Shaun Wang published it in "A class of distortion operators for pricing financial and insurance risks," Journal of Risk and Insurance, vol. 67, no. 1, 2000, pp. 15-36. For a loss X with survival function S(x) = P(X > x), the distorted probability is S*(x) = Φ(Φ⁻¹(S(x)) + λ), where Φ is the standard normal distribution, and the premium is the expectation under S*, that is the integral of S* over [0, +∞) for a positive loss. The parameter λ is the price of risk. At λ = 0 one recovers the pure premium; the higher λ goes, the more the tail swells. It belongs to the family of distortion measures, where Wang had already proposed, in the mid-1990s, the proportional hazard transform S(x)^(1/ρ). Two properties got it adopted. On a normal distribution with standard deviation σ, it returns a normal distribution with its mean shifted by λσ, which is the standard deviation principle. On the lognormal distribution of a stock price, it gives back Black-Scholes, which brings reinsurance pricing close to option pricing; Wang ties λ to systematic risk through the CAPM. For a reinsurance layer or a cat bond, the consequence shows in the multiple, the ratio of spread to expected loss: the same λ multiplies the expected loss of a low layer a little and that of a high layer a lot. Since the distortion function is concave, the Wang premium is also a spectral measure, and so coherent. Antoon Pelsser (2008) showed, however, that it does not, in general, give time-consistent, arbitrage-free prices for a stochastic process, geometric Brownian motion aside.

Its 8 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Wang transform: Actuarial science glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

Textbook case: two cat bond tranches of 100 million dollars each, treated as binary, total loss or nothing, with λ = 0.45. The high tranche has a 2% annual probability of being hit: Φ⁻¹(0.02) = -2.054, plus 0.45 gives -1.604, and Φ(-1.604) = 5.44%. The premium is 5.44% of notional, or 5.44 million, for an expected loss of 2 million: a multiple of 5.44 / 2 = 2.72. The low tranche has a 10% probability: Φ⁻¹(0.10) = -1.282, plus 0.45 gives -0.832, and Φ(-0.832) = 20.28%. A premium of 20.28 million for 10 million of expected loss: a multiple of 2.03.

Read next
Related terms
Also known as

Wang transform, Wang distortion, distortion risk measure, distortion operator, probability distortion pricing, Wang transform cat bond pricing, Wang transform reinsurance, proportional hazard transform

Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.