Skip to content
←Back to glossaryInsurance

Protection gap

The gap between the total economic losses caused by a risk and the share actually covered by insurance contracts.

Definition

The protection gap is the difference between the total economic losses a risk causes and the share covered by private or public insurance contracts. For natural catastrophes in 2024 it reached 181 billion dollars: 57 percent of total losses of 318 billion were uninsured. The figure is more than a market statistic. It measures what households, businesses and governments absorb on their own when a major shock hits, since every uninsured loss falls on private wealth or public budgets. In Europe, according to EIOPA, only about a quarter of losses from extreme events was insured between 1980 and 2024. The gap has several causes. Premiums look unaffordable to lower-income households in exposed areas. Many people misjudge their risk. Expecting public relief after a disaster creates moral hazard. And insurers pull out of areas whose risk can no longer be priced on commercially workable terms. The gap is also an early warning of a public funding crisis: the wider it gets, the more the state has to step in as a last resort, with nothing set aside. With climate change, it is widening in the most exposed areas. The Kahramanmaraş earthquake of February 6, 2023 gives the order of magnitude: more than 100 billion dollars of economic losses, about 5.5 billion insured according to Swiss Re, despite Turkey's compulsory earthquake insurance, DASK, set up in 2000 but poorly enforced and limited to residential buildings under a low cap. Two sources mix in the figure: penetration, when part of the population buys nothing, and underinsurance, when those insured are covered for too little. The French term déficit d'assurabilité misleads, since the risk is often insurable and simply not insured.

Its 20 cross-references, woven across the glossary's 18 categories
Protection gap: Insurance glossary illustration, AlgoPolis
Example

The January 2025 wildfires in southern California destroyed more than 18,000 structures. A large share of the affected properties were covered by the FAIR Plan, the insurer of last resort, whose exposure had quadrupled since 2015 as private insurers withdrew: the socialization of the insurance gap translated into a special assessment of approximately one billion dollars on member insurers.

Read next
Put it to work
Related terms
Related articles
On the Wire, where this term came up
Stay informed

Follow the research

One letter a week. First, the week's underwriting note, when one is published: a dated, argued decision, signed by Paul Bernardski. Then what the observatory published on cyber risk, political risk and insurance. No account, no tracking.

No spam, one-click unsubscribe, no data ever sold.